On Fri, 2004-12-24 at 15:19, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Since nobody has posted any actual information I must guess that some > files are mislabeled. E.g., ldconfig for some reason creates updated > glibc DOSs with > > system_u:object_r:lib_t > > instead of > > system_u:object_r:shlib_t Sorry, ldconfig regenerates the DSOs, not just the links and cache? If so, then it needs a patch to preserve the types on the DSOs. -- Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> National Security Agency