Re: Why don't you guys like synaptic?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I knew about yum, but I had never used it until my involvement with FC3
test.  I liked it.  Joe average doesn't want a textual install/update
tool.  Put a synaptic type front end on yum and it too would be a
winner. 

Ironically, yum on my machine is now broken <again> because the repos
aren't pointing anywhere meaningful. 

 



On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 11:48 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:49 -0700, Kim Lux wrote:
> > That was my point: synaptic and apt use rpms.  So if I've got a
> > dependency issue with apt and synaptic, I'll be having a dependency
> > issue with rpms as well.  I'd much, much rather use synaptic to take
> > care of those issues than doing it manually with rpms.
> > 
> > I've had to install packages in the past that have needed 6 to twelve
> > other packages.  (mplayer, xine, kdebase-devel of a new version, etc.)
> > When synaptic can do the install it is much, much easier than manually
> > doing it with rpms. 
> > 
> > I wasn't aware that synaptic was a single arch package.  I don't think
> > users care if synaptic isn't written in python.  They just want a system
> > to easily install packages with.  I'd say it works pretty darn good
> > 80-95% of the time. 
> 
> 
> I understand it is not graphical (yet) but you do know that yum exists,
> right?
> 
> yum install nameofpackage
> 
> it will download and install all the dependencies you need, too.
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
-- 
Kim Lux (Mr.)  Diesel Research Inc


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]