On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 03:52:13 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote: > > > PS Some of it could even be "legally" required in the sense that eg. > > fedora.us started its amavisd-new package from my SPEC file and I can't > > even peek to see what exactly they have changed. Bugzilla has some broken > > links, but there it ends. No SRPM, no SPEC file, no clue :) > > fedora.us spec files have been available separately for a very long > time linked at the top of http://fedora.us > > http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/ Well, those only contain the published RPMs SPEC files. My amavisd-new example is a real example. > Concerning "Fedora, Raw Hide, RHEL", progress bas been made with the CVS > server, which exists already and undergoes non-public beta testing. > Although I've not signed an NDA, it's up to Cristian Gafton to announce > any details. Ok. -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]