On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 03:52:13 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote: > PS Some of it could even be "legally" required in the sense that eg. > fedora.us started its amavisd-new package from my SPEC file and I can't > even peek to see what exactly they have changed. Bugzilla has some broken > links, but there it ends. No SRPM, no SPEC file, no clue :) fedora.us spec files have been available separately for a very long time linked at the top of http://fedora.us http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/ Concerning "Fedora, Raw Hide, RHEL", progress bas been made with the CVS server, which exists already and undergoes non-public beta testing. Although I've not signed an NDA, it's up to Cristian Gafton to announce any details. -- Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) - Linux 2.6.9-1.2_FC2 loadavg: 0.00 0.06 0.09
Attachment:
pgp61C41eAPS6.pgp
Description: PGP signature