On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 07:30 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > Just to overstretch analogies a bit, the "signature" of Fisher-Price on > > a kid's toy isn't different from the "signature" of Heckler&Koch on a > > submachine gun either. Despite that they convey very different messages > > ("when you push the button, the doll cries" vs. "... a whole family > > cries"). > > > > Let's face it, currently a signed package only means "someone/-thing has > > signed off on it" on a technical level, anything else is just what we > > At the technical level but not at the actual human level. At that point > brand comes into it. I don't argue that, but at the human level the Rawhide "brand" tells me something very different than the Fedora or RHEL final "brand". Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011