Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 09:48 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > This still forces me to use special tools like up2date and yum to access
> > the packages if I want to verify their origins.
> 
> Is this really all that big of a deal?

Sometimes you don't have it, sometimes they don't work (say I botched
python on my system -- "and then?") ;-). I use yum/up2date regularly but
I wouldn't want to have artificial barriers for people who for one or
the other reason want to or can only install with RPM.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]