Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Burton said:
[snip]
> As far as signing packages vs. signing meta-data... Digital signatures
> are like real signatures, you want to make sure they are actually attached
> to what you are signing.
[snip]

IIRC the discussion was that signed meta-data would have the signatures
attached to the MD5sums of the packages.  The MD5sums of the download
could then be checked against the meta-data, verifying that the package is
the same as the package used to create the meta-data.

-- 
William Hooper


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]