On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 14:59 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 13:04 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Timothy Sandel wrote: > > > > > > > 1. reiserfs-utils needs to be put back on CD1 so minimal install will > > > > work with only 1 CD. > > > > > > We don't support reiserfs, and moving the package onto CD1 might bump > > > other more important stuff off of CD1... > > > > > > > So why the heck is reiserfs-utils included in the package list for the > > "Minimal" install, then? It's not that commonly used, it's not on disc > > 1, it's not "supported"... why bloat the package list? > > Interesting question. reiserfs-utils is not listed in the 'comps' file so > I don't know how it gets considered a 'minimal' package. Is there another > package that Requires: reiserfs-utils? It only gets pulled in if you have a reiserfs filesystem (since then you need it for things like fsck to work) Jeremy