On Oct 26, 2004, Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The excuses for not including ntfs have varied over the years, always > changing. The decision not to include ntfs-readonly is an ideological > issue and not a technical or legal one. If you're so sure there isn't a legal issue, I'm sure you wouldn't mind signing an agreement with Red Hat, becoming personally responsible for any liability resulting from shipping a kernel with the NTFS module enabled, right? -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}