On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Paul Iadonisi wrote: > I also vaguely recall some reference to the fact that NTFS didn't pass > Red Hat's stress test for stability (i.e.: corruption type problems at > high loads). Can anyone from Red Hat confirm? The excuses for not including ntfs have varied over the years, always changing. The decision not to include ntfs-readonly is an ideological issue and not a technical or legal one. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65749 -Dan