On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 19:42 +0200, Matias F�ciano wrote: > > Let me try to summarise (in my bad English). > > It's up to me to decide to use a beta for a mission critical computer. > Right now, for my personal computer, I feel the risk is pay back because > this improve (I hope:-)) Fedora (and RHEL in a long run). And also > because I like enjoying with the latest technology. > > By not signing their rpm in rawhide, Red Hat "force" me to take risk > (fake rpm, ...) for _nothing_. I don't want to take these risks. > I can't believe you are making this argument.*You* "forced" yourself when *you* decided to use an unsupported beta. I mean you said it yourself: "It's up to me to decide to use a beta for a mission critical computer. Right now, for my personal computer, I feel the risk is pay back..." If you don't want to take those risks, then you shouldn't be using fedora rawhide. Regards, -- Ricardo Veguilla <veguilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>