Le dimanche 24 octobre 2004 à 20:40 -0700, Andrew Farris a écrit : > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:15 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote: > > > Official messages from the Red Hat security team are never sent > > > unsolicited, are always sent from the address > > > secalert@xxxxxxxxxx, and are digitally signed by GPG. All > > > official updates for Red Hat products are digitally signed and > > > should not be installed unless they are correctly signed and the > > > signature is verified..." > > > > Too bad rawhide updates often *are* unsigned. > > Which is chiefly why you're supposed to keep it off critical systems.. My personal computer (which run FC3 since FC3T2) is a "critical system". Not you ? Every one here know that rawhide can be completely buggy. It's not a reason to tolerate security hole. > that and the not-so-rare its-completely-borked-again occurrences. It > would certainly be nice to have them all come signed however. Yes.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=