On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 14:02 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:58:47AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > I hope to God there's a qualifier to that statement somewhere or that > > the nasties have been swiftly squashed, since my FC3-T2 system is now > > running a 2.6.9 kernel up2date gave me about 5 minutes ago... > > The qualifier is "remote DoS level but not afaik data corruptors" > Forgive the ignorance: does that mean that the 2.6.9-1.640 kernel I am now running has a DoS vulnerability? This does not horribly worry me, since my only FC3-T2 box is always behind stable and solid FC2 firewalls, but just to see if I understood you. Cheers, -- Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part