On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 09:13 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote: > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 19:34 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > > tir, 19.10.2004 kl. 07.09 skrev Douglas Furlong: > > > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:30 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:06:33 +0100, Douglas Furlong > > > > <snip> > > > And a nice link from the vino config section to the system-config- > > > sercuritylevel. > What is wrong with a user level configuration tool, like redhat-config- > printer, gdmsetup, or any number of other things, having a link to the > system-config-securitylelevel which requires root privileges? > > I accepted the "error" in my original statement, but I don't see what > the problem is with having the above linking together so that the user > see's where he is meant to go to get the system up and running. Currently we're not powerful enough in for custom ports. So that a user requires specific application knowledge to allow - 5900 say rather than selecting by service. I'm hoping to fix this after fc3 is out the door. I'd say wait until we have a easier to understand ui for this. Paul