On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 19:34 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote: > tir, 19.10.2004 kl. 07.09 skrev Douglas Furlong: > > On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:30 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:06:33 +0100, Douglas Furlong > > > <snip> > > > > > If you want to argue that system-config-securitylevel needs > > > should have a pre-defined entry for vino, that i can get behind. > > > > And a nice link from the vino config section to the system-config- > > sercuritylevel. > > > > Sounds like a better idea to me. > > Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Probably gdmsetup and > redhat-config-printer should do this as well. > What is wrong with a user level configuration tool, like redhat-config- printer, gdmsetup, or any number of other things, having a link to the system-config-securitylelevel which requires root privileges? I accepted the "error" in my original statement, but I don't see what the problem is with having the above linking together so that the user see's where he is meant to go to get the system up and running. -- Douglas Furlong Systems Administrator Firebox.com T: 0870 420 4475 F: 0870 220 2178
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part