Re: Question to F39 who did a new install apart upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 17:50:31 -0000
> "old sixpack13" <sixpack13(a)online.de&gt; wrote:
> 
> 
> This is just a wild guess, but the tzdata package was recently dropped
> as required by some packages.  Is it possible some fallout from this is
> the source of your problem?  Do you have the tzdata package(s)
> installed?
> 
rpm -qa|grep tzdata
tzdata-2023c-2.fc39.noarch
tzdata-java-2023c-2.fc39.noarch

more needed ?
box was a new install of F38 with the updated ISO at 2023-07-28 and upgraded to F39 since beta is out


> Another remote possibility is that your system isn't maintaining time
> properly.  Could the little pancake CR2032 battery be dead?

the box is new build from: 2021-10-12
my experiences with CMOS Batteries are: exchange needed when elder > 3 years
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux