Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/22/23 03:57, Kamil Paral wrote:
Here's a second draft. I took feedback here and also from the QA meeting
[1]. The split between the milestones makes this harder to read and
compare. If you have better ideas on how to do it, please tell me :-)


The only suggestion I have is for the foot notes under Final. Combine the second note into the first. Perhaps something like:

What does this cover?: The goal of this criterion is to ensure general desktop-related functionality for different types of applications. A small number of on-working applications (caused by applications themselves or the desktop environment) is not a violation of this criterion. An example of a violation would be if a significant number of QT applications couldn't be resized (but they should be), or if all Java applications failed to display any content. This criteria applies to all applications (including third-party ones), not just preinstalled ones. More window operations are required to work, For example the explicitly stated virtual workspaces workflows.

Otherwise this looks fine.

	Have a Great Day!

	Pat	(tablepc)
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux