Re: Proposal: Explicitly allow Council to waive Edition self-identification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:46:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I feel pretty strongly the opposite on that one. Ben pre-empted me on
> IRC by already suggesting this approach (which I'm fine with), but
> before he had sketched out the specific approach, I was going to
> specifically suggest *NOT* giving Council (or anybody else) a "this
> isn't a blocker" rubber stamp. To me there's a big difference between a
> "this is a blocker" button and a "this isn't a blocker" button. The
> temptation to overuse the latter just to get releases done on time
> would, I think, be entirely too great.

Very possibly! I would certainly feel the temptation. This is why I said
that it's good for me to listen to those of y'all who are good at process.
:)


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux