On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 17:54 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > This is another attempt at creating a new release criterion specific for > graphical package managers. We already discussed it in November, but we > couldn't agree easily on some particular details, and then I was gone for a > long time: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/LR2FDFMOY4E55ZYBHWOOINZS27FQ6LSB/#LR2FDFMOY4E55ZYBHWOOINZS27FQ6LSB > > Here is my new attempt. The new criterion text is longer, but I believe it > is overall somewhat weaker (to accommodate some of the previous concerns), > just more explicit. As before, please note that we already have package > management partly covered in the Basic criteria [1] and Beta criteria [2]. > Please read those first, including footnotes. The following new criterion > is proposed against the Final milestone: This definitely seems like an improvement to me. Thanks a lot for drafting it. I think it's probably fine to go ahead with it at least as a first take, we can always refine it later as we go along. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
