================================== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting ================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:33 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-11-29/fedora-qa.2021-11-29-16.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:01:42) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:10:30) * ACTION: "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality" criterion regarding arches" (adamw, 16:11:07) * "adamw to convert retrospective entries to pagure tickets later this week" - this one I did do! and we'll talk about it more later. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/AZHTTFG2A33LFODM6MC3EXPVOZTYXVOK/ (adamw, 16:13:01) * Fedora 36 status (adamw, 16:14:43) * composes are running and tests are nearly all passing, nothing seems to be obviously on fire (adamw, 16:16:45) * Fedora 35 Retrospective proposed actions (adamw, 16:22:21) * ACTION: adamw to follow through on the proposed retrospective actions (adamw, 16:31:03) * Current criteria / test case proposals (adamw, 16:31:19) * it'd be good for more folks to respond to kparal's post requesting input on the package management criteria: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BQUOUIZA24XLQEENY4NLDES4MMKIPSGN/ (adamw, 16:38:09) * Test Day / community event status (adamw, 16:42:28) * LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/682#comment-764988 (sumantro, 16:42:46) * kernel 5.15 test week went well, with 336 tests by 96 testers (adamw, 16:44:24) * more test days are coming in a few weeks as the F36 cycle spins up (adamw, 16:44:33) * Open floor (adamw, 16:44:39) Meeting ended at 16:51:40 UTC. Action Items ------------ * "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality" criterion regarding arches" * adamw to follow through on the proposed retrospective actions Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * "adamw to try and clarify intent of "default application functionality" criterion regarding arches" * adamw to follow through on the proposed retrospective actions * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (54) * sumantro (16) * zodbot (9) * lruzicka2 (9) * frantisekz (2) * bytehackr (2) * core_module (1) * coremodule (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
