On 10/27/21 17:02, Felix Miata wrote:
Chris Murphy composed on 2021-10-27 19:40 (UTC-0400):
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 02:32 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
# rpm -qa | egrep 'grub|prober|shim'
#
This F34 installation has no need of any bootloader. Yet:
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=35 --skip-broken --allowerasing --best
...
Error:
Problem: package grubby-8.40-55.fc35.x86_64 requires grub2-tools-minimal, but
none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- package grub2-tools-minimal-1:2.06-6.fc35.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude
filtering
Do you have soft dependencies enabled? Nothing on my installed system
requires grubby, but two things recommend it: crypto-policies-scripts
and kexec-tools . If soft deps are enabled, either of those could be
pulling it in.
grubby is in @core in comps
Does this translate to I have no option to not let it be installed?
No, that translates to "feel free to remove grubby". Hopefully the
kernel install scripts are designed to not fail if it's missing.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
