Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:13 PM Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/13/21 9:39 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> [Snip]
> >
> >> There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop.
> >
> > Of course, we can always adjust this criterion in the future.
> >
> [Snip]
>
> Does that make this[0] a blocker candidate?

Probably more likely this final release criterion:

All system services present after installation with one of the
release-blocking package sets must start properly, unless they require
hardware which is not present.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria#System_services


> Somewhat related, is there some mapping of compose test cases to release
> criterion? Or the inverse? Something like "Failures of test case foo,
> bar, and baz may constitute a violation of release criterion qux"?

I'm pretty sure it's all contained to the Basic, Beta, and Final
release criteria pages.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux