On 10/28/20 11:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 10:55:28 -0400, pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote:
<snip>
I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP
Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand.
https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-x86_64-CHECKSUM
Perhaps the CHECKSUM files were not previously signed.
Thanks for your reply. The checksum file you sent gives the same OK and
Warning results as above;
Yes, it also includes the 19 lines for the PGP signature, which
sha256sum doesn't understand. So, this is expected.
Are you saying that the warning message about the 19 lines is a don't
care or is their a problem with the way the checksum file is made? Does
this mean that the OK message that comes first is in error?
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
