Re: F33 WS ISO checksum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 10:55:28 -0400, pmkellly@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 10/28/20 10:16, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> <snip>
> > 
> > I think sha256sum is pointing out the 19 lines related to the PGP
> > Signature in the CHECKSUM file, which it can't understand.
> > 
> > https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> > 
> > Perhaps the CHECKSUM files were not previously signed.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your reply. The checksum file you sent gives the same OK and
> Warning results as above;

Yes, it also includes the 19 lines for the PGP signature, which
sha256sum doesn't understand. So, this is expected.


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux