On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 16:55 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hi QA friends, > > I'm working with the IoT team to button up the > (in-the-process-of-being-approved) process for promotion to Edition. Apart > from the fact that the PRD currently lacks the following things: > > - Core services & features > - Core applications > - Unique policies for installation, updates, etc > > how satisfied are you with the state of the release criteria for IoT as an > edition (and the subsequent ability to test)? Are there glaring issues we > absolutely have to fix or can we improve things iteratively over the next > few releases? > > (I wanted to bring this up in today's meeting, but then I wasn't able to > attend most of it. We can discuss next week if there's a meeting) The current release criteria and test cases are certainly a viable set, and we're working towards automating them as much as possible. I'm not aware of any major problems. Having said that, codifying the things you identified as missing from the PRD might naturally expose additional required criteria/test cases. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
