It looks or appears to me that many if not all packages in Rawhide are slightly
more recent versions that the ones available via flatpak. I know some flatpaks
also offer a choice of a nightly version.
I was just wondering or pondering, which packages Rawhiders,
prefer to run as a flatpak or vice-versa.
Would Rawhide be more stable to run all available packages in flatpak ?
Or is that too cumbersome ? Or does that defeat the
purpose of testing packages ?
I used flatpaks for over a year, but I am not yet a flatpak-lover, or flatpak-fanboy
or whatever they call themselves. I do not really have a need for the extra-security
of a sandboxed program. The number one thing about flatpaks that I like, is that they
are so easy to delete, so I like to install a flatpak of a program that I am not familiar
with.
David Locklear
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
