On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:43 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Well, you could check based on EVR of fedora-release. Stable release > > > is always has Release field bumped to 1, and unstable is below 1. > > > > True -- as long as people don't get the idea that this means that release > > candidates are final. > > > > Considering that we just upload a given RC as "Final" if the Go/No-Go > decision goes in that RC's favor, I think that's fine. Presumably, this extension is going to need to be revised for the new logo sometime soon anyway; where should I file a feature request to have it also include the "prerelease" information? If the extension can just include some text read from /usr/lib/os-release, that would be easiest, as we could then just have it display PRETTY_NAME and set up the fedora-release package to have PRETTY_NAME be "Fedora 32 (Workstation Edition Pre-release)" until RC (we change other things at that time anyway, such as disabling the -testing repos, so we can add this tweak to the process). _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
