On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 19:10 Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:10 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:48 AM Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must not time out frequently or regularly when they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown.
>
I like it generally, but I worry we'll get hung up on the definition
of "frequently" or "regularly". For shutdown in particular, I'm less
concerned with service timeouts (granted, I'm not paying for my
compute by the minute). I'm leaning toward something like
"predictably" or "reliably" (which is an awkward use of the word).
Basically, it's not a blocker unless it does it every time.
Yeah, I'd prefer something like:All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must not time out every time when they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown.I like the general proposal, just different wording seems better. If timeout doesn't happen regularly, I won't block on it.
I like the wording on this better. And I am very much in favor of the proposal.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
