Happy New Year Everyone!
In my prior experience I was expected to keep any problem reports I
filed (like bug reports) followed up on and make sure they got closed.
For me it's a long established habit.
I like to keep my bugzilla list short. Sometimes bugs that I have filed
are fixed without without being closed. They just hang around until they
age out of the system and someone closes them.
Sometimes, bugs just age and age because I have updated them to be
applicable to the current version of Fedora, but no one has had time to
look at them. This isn't a criticism. I understand the some bugs are low
priority for a number of good reasons.
Today I sent some e'mails to the assignees of some bugs that I think
should be closed because they are fixed, have been superseded by another
bug, or in one case the application was retired.
I re-read the pages in the wiki on bug reports and the topic of closing
bugs seems missing except for "end of life"
Question: Is this an okay thing to do? I asked this once before in the
context of a particular bug and the recommendation was that I should
send an e'mail to the assignee. I just want to determine if this is a
good general case practice.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
