On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 15:54 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > We currently have the following Beta criterion: > "The release-blocking images must meet current size requirements." [1] > > The latest "Workstation image is oversized" bug [2] showed that we don't > consider this requirement to be that critical. People mostly agreed that > having a slightly oversized image at Beta is no big deal. And there's much > truth to it. The limits were critical when we used optical media, but with > flash drives, there is always an option to use a larger one. > > Considering this, I believe it makes sense to move the current criterion > from Beta to Final. > > There are other options to handle this, like giving the image size e.g. 10% > headroom during Beta. We can do this, but the more I think about it, the > less value I see in it. If the image was 11% over size, would it really > matter? I think we actually don't care image image size restrictions before > Final release at all. For Final release, sure, some groups want to fit X GB > flash drives, and some groups want to fit onto a DVD disc. But for Beta we > can always test it just fine, regardless the size (and no images are > release blocking for optical media for Beta). > Thoughts? We could consider still enforcing sizes which clearly relate to optical media (so, basically, 700MB and 4.7GB sizes). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
