On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey folks! So, it was suggested at the blocker review meeting on Monday > that violations of the Basic desktop background criterion: > > "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last > two stable releases." > > should be added to the 'automatic blocker' list: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers > > this is basically a list of cases where blocker status is so clear-cut > and obvious that there's no need for us to vote on it, and any > stakeholder can just invoke the 'automatic blocker' policy and mark a > bug as 'AcceptedBlocker' if it matches one of the cases in the list. > > Does anyone have any objection to adding this? If not, I'll go ahead > and do it next week. Thanks! I object to not calling them Captain Obvious blockers instead of Automatic blockers. But whatevs, not a hill... (I'm amused imaging that whoever files the bug sets the whiteboard *and* writes that it's a Captain Obvious blocker bug). -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
