On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 18:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:59 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey folks! So, it was suggested at the blocker review meeting on Monday > > that violations of the Basic desktop background criterion: > > > > "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last > > two stable releases." > > > > should be added to the 'automatic blocker' list: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers > > > > this is basically a list of cases where blocker status is so clear-cut > > and obvious that there's no need for us to vote on it, and any > > stakeholder can just invoke the 'automatic blocker' policy and mark a > > bug as 'AcceptedBlocker' if it matches one of the cases in the list. > > > > Does anyone have any objection to adding this? If not, I'll go ahead > > and do it next week. Thanks! > > I'm a bit surprised this wasn't _already_ a blocker, but sounds good to me! It is already a blocker, that's why there's a criterion. The proposal is to add it to the smaller list of cases that are considered *automatic* blockers - i.e. when we encounter one of these cases we can just go ahead and tag them as AcceptedBlocker without the usual requirement for 3 votes from members of the relevant groups (qa, devel, releng). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
