On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0100 Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote: > > I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today. The large > > majority of them installed successfully, but the packages in the > > attached file didn't. There are 411 of them, which is few for as > > many > > packages as there are in Fedora. > > > > I'm curious why the same mechanism that dnf uses on install on a pc > > couldn't be used in the build process. When someone submits a > > build, wouldn't it be possible to see if it would break the > > existing state, and ask the submitter if they would like to build > > the dependencies with > > their new package? Too complex? > > Can you send results with `dnf install -b yourpackages ` please ? > > to have some clues . It's a bash file that runs dnf. The files are listed inside. All you have to do is edit the command line to change -y --skip-broken to -y -b, and you can run it using bash and see the results on your system if you have rawhide installed. That puts you in control of the output. I've also attached the file.
Attachment:
dnf_ror.save
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx