Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 13:49 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> 
> Accepted blockers
> -----------------
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509 - libdnf - POST
> F29 to Rawhide (F30) upgrades fail, seems to be modularity-related
> 
> Reassigned to DNF. Patch merged upstream to fix the issue.

This is not really true - see my comment #31. We need more clarity on
this from modularity and DNF folks. It is not POST any more, it is
ASSIGNED, I changed this three days ago to reflect the fact that the
supposed 'fix' doesn't actually seem to be a full practical fix.

> 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197 - gdm - NEW
> gdm Fails to load with "nomodeset"
> 
> Boot process hangs when nomodeset is used as a boot parameter. No
> further information available yet.

I requested testing on desktop@ and test@ lists earlier this week; so
far that seems to suggest that this is failing for a lot of people on a
lot of hardware...but it also fails the same way on F29 in most cases,
suggesting we shipped F29 broken as well. I don't think we've yet had
feedback from a system where nomodeset is actually *needed*, which
would be interesting.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux