Re: kernel update process (failure)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed Greshko composed on 2018-03-21 20:25 (UTC+0800):

> I know this isn't strictly a "test" question.  But I think maybe more folks with
> greater insight my be lurking here.

> In troubleshooting a kernel update issue on the user's list it was finally determined
> that if one erased "grubby" the kernel would not get upgraded properly.  RPM would
> show the new kernel installed but it would not be in the boot menu and the needed
> files would not be in /boot.  There is a scriplet error, but it is called "nonfatal". 

cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530555
dnf update fails to move new vmlinuz and initramfs to /boot/ on installations
requiring no installed bootloader

> I feel this to be a bugzilla.  So, my question is, should kernel-core require
> /sbin/new-kernel-pkg or should it be a "protected" package in the dnf configuration? 
> Or something else?
-- 
"Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux