On 03/19/2018 09:29 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Would it also be possible to use a different term than "Third > party repositories" in the software repositories dialogue? What's > happening now is that the repositories from the > fedora-workstation-repositories package come under "Third party > repositories" accompanied by the notice on how some of these may be > proprietary, and other third party repositories that users may have > enabled themselves, such as Adobe/Dropbox/RPMFusion are coming up > in a separate section. This isn't quite intuitive---it almost gives one > the feeling that the latter are not "third party". Sure, suggestions for better wording are very welcome. This is the best we've managed to come up with so far. >> Yes, we are supposed to get a new docs page for this. I'll talk to >> mattdm and see how far we are with this. I'll make sure we update the >> link before pushing it out to stable. > > I see this is up at the moment. It isn't updated, though (A ticket has > been filed for Nvidia repositories etc already but I didn't want to update > the page myself because I'm not completely sure of the complete process > at the moment) > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_list > > > I would really like whatever page we link to to have a clear, end-user > targeted summary of free software and our commitment to it right at the > top, and then possibly a rationale as to why we're making it easy for > users to install some very commonly used proprietary software to improve > usability. Yes. I believe mattdm wanted to have a new docs.fedoraproject.org page with end-user facing text that we can link to from gnome-software. -- Kalev _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
