Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Thanks for starting the discussion, Ankur! I was just about to send a
request for testing to the test list.

I just pushed gnome-software 3.28.0 to F27 updates-testing that
implements Fedora Workstation Third Party Repositories as approved in
https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/121

This brings the gnome-software version in F27 in sync with what's in
F28. We spent a large part of the 3.28 cycle doing polish and papercut
fixes and it should make gnome-software in F27 much more stable and usable.

Would be awesome if some more people could give it a spin and test
gnome-software over next two weeks or so, in particular to make sure
that it doesn't regress any existing functionality (especially updating,
where it may take time to discover issues).

More replies in-line down below:

On 03/18/2018 01:28 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> - Clicking "enable" should tell the user what repositories were made
>   available for activation. Open up the "software sources" dialogue
>   straight-away, maybe?

Good point. I'll talk to aday (gnome-software designer) and discuss
this. We were polishing the new software repositories dialog a lot, but
the notification that appears on the overview page didn't get that much
love. I'll see what we can do; maybe just disable the notification for now.

> - The "find out more" link goes to the wikipedia page on properietary
>   software, which is frankly useless. The Fedora Forbidden items would
>   be a better page[2]. I would think the Forbidden Items page should
>   require a section explaining what Gnome-software is doing here. The
>   ideal scenario would be a special page that describes the individual
>   repositories that are included in the fedora-workstation-repositories
>   package. It should be a page that clearly speaks about free-software,
>   and Fedora's commitment to it.  I.e., it must educate users about the
>   matter, and say "if you must use software that is not free/open
>   source, you can do so here."

Yes, we are supposed to get a new docs page for this. I'll talk to
mattdm and see how far we are with this. I'll make sure we update the
link before pushing it out to stable.

> - And of course, can RPMFusion repositories be included here too if
>   we're happy to include Google's software?

Please open a ticket on https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation -- I don't
know the exact process how to add new repos, but I believe opening a
ticket there would be a start.

> I didn't want to comment on the update. Where would the right place to
> discuss this be?

desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx please.

Thanks,
Kalev
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux