On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different software on > different architectures? It might make perfect sense to use browser X on > x86_64 because it's very good, but use browser Y on i386 because of memory > limitations of i386 arch (browser Y needing much less memory than browser > X). Similarly, if shell A no longer supports i386, why would be ban it from Speaking as someone who "sells" this stuff, I think it'd be confusing for the Editions to offer different software (except where dictated by enabling the hardware). It'd be better to just say that we don't offer the Edition and instead suggest various spins for architectures where this comes up. Or, where we decide it's important enough, to make sure we use software that works across all relevant archs (or if possible to fix it when it doesn't work). -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
