Il giorno mer, 15/02/2017 alle 09.35 -0500, Mike Ruckman ha scritto: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:02:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! I've got a question for everyone who helps out with > > release > > validation testing. It's related to the project to build a new > > system > > for submitting those results. We have a ticket for designing that > > system: > > > > https://pagure.io/design/issue/483 > > > > and as part of the discussion there, we're wondering something. > > Given > > that it's part of the new design that there's some kind of step > > where > > you specify which particular image you're testing, does it make > > more > > sense to you if you choose things in this order: > > > > 1. Pick a test to run > > 2. Pick an image to run the test on > > > > Or this order: > > > > 1. Pick an image to test > > 2. Pick a test to run on the image > > > > ? It's pretty important to the design approach. Thanks! > > > > (Please do feel free to read the ticket and mention any other > > thoughts > > you have on the design, too.) > > -- > > Adam Williamson > > Fedora QA Community Monkey > > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . > > net > > http://www.happyassassin.net > > I also pick an image and then run tests against it. > > // Mike > -- > Fedora QA > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I'm a bit late but... I usually pick a Desktop image (ideally, I pick one which has not been tested yet, or misses some important results) and then perform the tests I have time for. --- Giulio (juliuxpigface) _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
