On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 12:07 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:06:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > My 2 cents is it should be the primary download for Beta release, and > > if that's not possible then push it to Fedora 25. And also what are > Yeah, I agree. We'll need at least a round of testing like that > *somewhere*, and if not beta, then it's gotta be the next beta. > > > > > the minimum acceptable deliverables? Fedora 22 and 23 probably? How > > many versions of Windows? 7, 8, 10? And then OS X at all? At least > > there's a fallback on OS X, dd exists there. > I think we want it on Windows 7+ and at least the most recent couple of > versions of OS X. But if we don't have one, I don't think that should > be a blocker — we can just offer it where available, right? Well I think the issue is this idea of it being the 'primary deliverable' - the messaging gets a bit confusing if we have to say "This is the thing you should download and this is how you use it! Oh, unless you're running (FOO OS) in which case you have to download this totally other thing and use it this totally different way..." > For Fedora Workstation, can we kick this over to GNOME Software, or > should it be actually a separate, standalone download? What about with > other spins or non-edition Fedora running GNOME? That's another thing that needs clarifying, I think - what the download links will do exactly for Linux users. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
