Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 09:45 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > It would be nice of course if there was a tool for doing this, then the
> > > text could be reduced to 'run the magic tool and make sure it says OK'.
> > I'll do some thinking whether I can write such a magical tool.
> Here we go:
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/track-previous-release-blocker.py

#!/usr/bin/env python2

there's no excuse for this. ;)

What's the deal with making args.nvr a list then requiring it to be
exactly one item long?

> A bit more complicated than I expected. But now we can simplify the
> instructions to this:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kparal/Draft:SOP_blocker_bug_process&oldid=436628#Tracking_AcceptedPreviousRelease_blocker_bugs
> 
> What do you think?

+1! And of course eventually we can integrate it into making this
process more automated.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux