On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 13:12 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:10:15PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.0 > > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.1 > It appears that a new format of "Rawhide Report Rawhide" is skimping > on a rather important information about broken dependencies. That means > that if they appear, and they do show up with regularity, the choices > are either to wait quietly and hope that such breakage will be noticed > and fixed, eventually, or file a bugzilla report (maybe after some delay > - but how long?). Any sage suggestions? The best would be to have > a broken dependencies info back. We are working on it. There is a *lot* of stuff that needs doing for the Pungi 4 switchover. Dennis is aware of the missing depcheck information and working on getting it back. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
