On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:23 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 06:33 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > As a middle ground, what about having: > > > .---------------------------------------------------. > > > | BIOS UEFI| > > > |Testcase_upgrade_dnf_previous_any | > > > '---------------------------------------------------' > > > > > > I think that's reasonable? Maybe we don't even need to modify and use > > > the template content, just reference other test cases and say that > > > any of them is fine. > > > > Yeah, that would be OK, I think. Of course in a sane TCMS we'd have a > > better way of saying 'out of these tests, at least one needs to be done > > for each environment' and calculating coverage and such, but this is > > Wikitcms ;) > > I have made the changes: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Installation_test_matrix#Upgrade > > This is the new test case: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_dnf_previous_any > > Originally I wanted to use something like this in the test case: > {{Testcase upgrade|(any flavor)}} > > However, that didn't work and I could wrap my mind around all the templates, so I ended up with that bare-bones description. I hope it's fine, patches welcome :) I like it the way it is anyway, it's clearer that it's just a 'synthetic' entry in the table. Thanks. We will need to adjust openqa_fedora_tools for this, I think - I'll check that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
