System-upgrade across two releases raises an interesting End-of-Life policy issue. If system-upgrade from N-2 to N is so important it will block release of N until it works, how do we explain why it is no longer important after four weeks when N-2 reaches End of Life? Four weeks is little time to allow users who chose not to upgrade to N-1 to move from N-2 to N. Do we say "After four weeks, the only supported mechanismm is new installation of N"? That is clear and simple, consistent with the EOL schedule, but denies system-upgrade is such a critical facility. Should system-upgrade be formally supported for three releases (18 months?) That would tell users they may count on it for their upgrade plan, but it is a significant change that could involve FESCo. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
