On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote: > On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: >> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: >>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >>>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>>>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently tested with: >>>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >>>>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>>>> >>>>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >>>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>>> >>>> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >>>> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >>>> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >>>> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >>>> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >>>> >>> >>> >>> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of >>> - Test compilation: >>> http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO >>> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso >>> >>> >> >> >> Failed to mount /sysroot >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 >> >> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 > From mezcalero: > <quote> > Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. > </quote> > > Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. > > Maybe http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/commit/?id=6cfa04faa1beb87f2dd794b7a4df37ce5d1c8407 in combination with dracut not including 60-block.rules -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
