On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote: > On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote: >> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote: >>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote: >>>> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images. >>>>> >>>>> Currently tested with: >>>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150531.iso >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150602.iso >>>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>>> >>>> Is there a report on the bootability of these images? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150608.iso >>> Failed to mount /sysroot >>> >>> 220-x are all broken in this sense - Failed to mount /sysroot >>> - systemd-220-5.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-3.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-2.fc23 >>> - systemd-220-1.fc23 >>> >> >> >> Last "bootable" is systemd-219-15.fc23 - as part of >> - Test compilation: >> http://goo.gl/Gm4ffO >> ISO/Rawhide-Live-Xfce.iso >> >> > > > Failed to mount /sysroot > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229665 > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90913#c5 >From mezcalero: <quote> Well, this is the mount tool saying that it doesn't known the "nfs" file system type. That might have a number of different reasons, such as mount.nfs or the kernel nfs modules missing from the initrd or the kernel in general. Either way it's unlikely to be a systemd issue. Please ask the initrd, util-linux or kernel maintainers for help on this. </quote> Guys, please comment on that so I can change to related component. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
