On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So for a tl;dr summary, the active proposals are: > > 1) Add this footnote to the Windows dual-boot criterion: "The > bootloader entry part of this criterion does not apply when Secure > Boot is enabled." > > 2) Reduce the OS X criterion to "The installer must be able to > install into free space alongside an existing OS X installation, > install and configure a bootloader that will boot Fedora." > > 3) Add a footnote to the Alpha 'Release-blocking images must boot' > criterion: "For the x86_64 architecture, UEFI with Secure Boot > configured in accordance with Microsoft's Windows certification > requirements is considered a 'commonly found' firmware type." > > If anyone has comments on those proposals or really wants to propose > a Linux dual/multi-boot criterion, please go ahead and speak up :) As no-one seemed opposed to these, I've gone ahead and implemented all three. Thanks folks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
