Re: OS X dual boot criterion problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> So for a tl;dr summary, the active proposals are:
> 
> 1) Add this footnote to the Windows dual-boot criterion: "The 
> bootloader entry part of this criterion does not apply when Secure 
> Boot is enabled."
> 
> 2) Reduce the OS X criterion to "The installer must be able to 
> install into free space alongside an existing OS X installation, 
> install and configure a bootloader that will boot Fedora."
> 
> 3) Add a footnote to the Alpha 'Release-blocking images must boot' 
> criterion: "For the x86_64 architecture, UEFI with Secure Boot 
> configured in accordance with Microsoft's Windows certification 
> requirements is considered a 'commonly found' firmware type."
> 
> If anyone has comments on those proposals or really wants to propose 
> a Linux dual/multi-boot criterion, please go ahead and speak up :)

As no-one seemed opposed to these, I've gone ahead and implemented all 
three. Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux