========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by roshi at 17:06:14 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-02-02-17.06.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (roshi, 17:06:15) * Introduction (roshi, 17:09:07) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi, 17:09:08) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 17:09:12) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (roshi, 17:09:14) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 17:09:17) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi, 17:09:19) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi, 17:09:22) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria (roshi, 17:09:24) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria (roshi, 17:09:27) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria (roshi, 17:09:30) * (1185999) [Gtk3] Text on various bits of chrome (tab titles, menus, buttons...) is white with GTK+ 3.15.4 (roshi, 17:09:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185999 (roshi, 17:09:52) * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW (roshi, 17:09:55) * AGREED: - 1185999 - AcceptedBlocker Final - This bug is a conditional violation of the Alpha criterion, "It must be possible to run the default web browser and a terminal application from all release-blocking desktop environments..." but isn't deemed bad enough to block until a later Milestone as FF *technically* works. (roshi, 17:31:11) * (1187742) rebuild openldap with support for moznss (roshi, 17:32:05) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187742 (roshi, 17:32:06) * Proposed Blocker, openldap, NEW (roshi, 17:32:06) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria#Roles (roshi, 17:36:09) * AGREED: - 1187742 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta criterion: "Release-blocking roles and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core functional Role Definition Requirements..." (roshi, 17:39:35) * Discussion Time (roshi, 17:40:17) * Last working boot.iso is the currently nominated nightly. Live images have more recent images to test (roshi, 18:03:27) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-February/001530.html (danofsatx, 18:07:11) Meeting ended at 18:10:22 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * roshi (120) * adamw (64) * kparal (43) * danofsatx (27) * pschindl (12) * zodbot (5) * nirik (4) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test