On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Stijn Hoop <stijn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:26:34 -0800 > Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So workaroundable, but still it intrudes on the usecase. I guess it's up > to the anaconda developers whether it's a sane one :-) I think it's sane to say we shouldn't support shared boot without an agreed upon spec in place. But I don't think it's sane to require reformatting a volume to achieve that lack of support. Just fsck the filesystem and maybe warn the user that overwriting (same named files) is going to happen and get on with it. There's nothing actually wrong with the fs, so I think required formatting is excessive. This isn't required on Windows or OS X btw, so long as the fs is a valid volume format and mounts without error, it's a legitimate install target. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
