BTRFS? - Re: Testing F21 hard drive installation - what partition type to test?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now that I am into the install, I can see how my choices are set up. Rather obscure that 'standard' means EXT4. But with the auto selected BTFRS both / and /home are in the same volume and I can't see how to alter the size of this volume in order to increase the size of swap (I want 2x memory for swap). I finally gave up, after some trial; perhaps if I deleted the BTFRS partition, I could then increase swap then recreate it?

In the end, for now, I switched to standard, as it is easy to first shrink /, then increase swap, and finally by removing the size in /home altogether, to get /home to take up all that is available for it.

Definitely, later, going to have to figure out how to setup btfrs to get supposedly better SSD performance over ext4.

Meanwhile, once I used the netinst server iso, I saw how easy it is to select a workstation. So I'll know soon if I have nvram problems with f21.

thank you.

On 11/25/2014 01:42 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well, I am now booted up with Live Workstation F21 TC4 on my Lenovo x120e.

But my first task I want to do is a Anaconda hard drive install. With no real workstation install media, it seems that the server install media is the way to go at this point.

My current Lenovo x120e running F20 (where we had that bug with nvram writing) is set up as:

# parted /dev/sda print
Model: ATA Crucial_CT240M50 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 240GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:

Number  Start   End     Size    File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 211MB 210MB fat16 EFI System Partition boot
 2      211MB   735MB   524MB   ext4
 3      735MB   32.2GB  31.5GB  ext4
 4      32.2GB  40.6GB  8389MB  linux-swap(v1)
 5      40.6GB  240GB   199GB   ext4

The new unit is the same model with the same SSD drive.

I have been using ext4, but am aware that there might be newer, 'better' types for notebooks. Should I stay with testing ext4 or should I test a different type out?

I have a local repo with the whole os directory. I can do a local netinstal Or at least that is the theory.



--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux